| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
705
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 03:02:56 -
[1] - Quote
Ms Michigan wrote: MINING activity
Ms Michigan wrote: get those subscriber numbers back up
ummmmmmmm |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
705
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 03:14:03 -
[2] - Quote
boy howdy the first thing i think of when approaching the problem of eve retention rate is making more mining activities |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
707
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:00:35 -
[3] - Quote
davet517 wrote: Stop making null-sec richer and safer, ffs. It's already too rich, and it's already too safe.
highsec incursions |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
707
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:01:29 -
[4] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote:So all those soon to be ok systems in Branch (that might see 1 person active in them a day) are still off the table without a blue tick next to your name.. Shame - that space could be put to good use by smaller groups. i mean you're certainly welcome to try to put it to use yourself
it is not like the space becomes unusable by hostiles the second it gets conquered
you could also try to, y'know, conquer the space yourself |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
707
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:02:59 -
[5] - Quote
Orca Platypus wrote:How surprising, another gewn buff.
20 Nyxgewnbots ratting in a cynojammed pocket in now officially a thing.
I thought CCP will never go through with the gewn proposal of more anoms, I believed that much favor was ridiculous even for CCP. But no, I see now that there is no favor CCP won't do to their masters.
Please reconsider the anomaly changes. I am asking this as a nullbear living in -0.1 system. This creates a huge PvE favor to one alliance, and while intentions might've been good, the implementation is unacceptable. where the hell do you get a pocket in deklein, the entire region is on the pipe
also confirming that goons own all anomalies in the game in all regions and that any increase in anoms is strictly to the benefit of GOonswarm Federation |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
707
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:04:53 -
[6] - Quote
"if goons benefit even a little from a change then the change is fundamentally flawed and i must spite my face by cutting off my nose" |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
708
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:18:54 -
[7] - Quote
also the idea of a cynojammer meaning anything in deklein is hilarious because approximately 2% of deklein is reachable from adjacent NPC space at a 5LY range, which means the only things that can even attack into deklein are blops (drops), which ignore cynojammers, or WHs, which also ignore cynojammers |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
709
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:19:44 -
[8] - Quote
basically the whole post is fundamentally flawed and it only takes a few SNIPES from the periphery to reveal it as unfounded garbage |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
709
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 13:40:05 -
[9] - Quote
Sgt Ocker wrote: blue donut
lmbo |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
713
|
Posted - 2015.07.09 18:27:25 -
[10] - Quote
kai il wrote:I remember when CCP said "we think wormholes are in a good spot and probably the most balanced part of space" then ccp started to change it and it all went down hill and now we have A giant krab empire in highclass with no fights because everyone ****** off and getting fights in null is now 10 times as hard.
nerf diplomacy |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
717
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 14:45:35 -
[11] - Quote
there is also a bunch of technical debt that prevents them from easily adding new mission agents, iirc it is a 100% manual process and with outposts being droppable by anyone at any time i don't think they wanna pay an intern to sit and F5 dotlan to put in agents in every new outpost |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
717
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 16:11:50 -
[12] - Quote
yeah i can see like conquerable stations (read: stations in systems like NOL and VFK that are not player dropped outposts) in regions getting mission agents maybe? that would be a one time expenditure of effort and give some life back to stations that are currently 100% worthless |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
718
|
Posted - 2015.07.10 19:17:28 -
[13] - Quote
Jeremiah Saken wrote:Black Pedro wrote:Yes, that is exactly what I said - those sites belong to the Sov holder if they can defend them. The reason they are in the game in the first place is to be something players can fight over. So go out there a generate some in-game content by stealing them instead of moaning on the forums about how unfair these changes are to you personally.
Why do I get the feeling you have no idea how exploration looks like? How those new upgrades will work? How high will be the spawning bonus? They double it, but what is the base stat? What will happen if corp spawn all of them at max level all around one constellation? For example in Omist? Do they suck up all sites from region? What is the max spawn bonus? If corp will suck up to a bubbled constellation it will be binary situation. Null corp will win here. I don't want to be in-game content to some sov null corp, I won't stand a chance with prepared players (they have ships in place i have to jump +30 systems to go there). You are focused at: "they hold sov, they should get the rewards". Exploration are not growing potatos or planting apples. It about finding the sites actively not growing them. "sov is not something i have, therefore it should not have things" |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
719
|
Posted - 2015.07.12 23:18:40 -
[14] - Quote
Vic Jefferson wrote:Rowells wrote:Are havens unique with escalations or drops? Everyone wants to be doing Havens/Sanctums to get the 10/10 escalation nah |

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
719
|
Posted - 2015.07.13 18:56:45 -
[15] - Quote
Sexy Cakes wrote:Quote:intended to ease some of the concerns around WH power projection without negatively impacting wormhole residents or eliminating the ability of Nullsec entities to roam through wormholes. in a post phoebe world power projection is a joke and far more tedious. Now a nerf to WH power projection. You guys are chaining an anchor to everyone these days... what gives? "power projection that i can't do is bad, but power projection i can do should not be nerfed"
|

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support Goonswarm Federation
720
|
Posted - 2015.07.13 22:51:37 -
[16] - Quote
guys we must preserve the battle functionality of the rorqual at the cost of making it unsuitable for every possible task it actually excelled at by castrating its jump range |
| |
|